Articles tagged in domain

  1. auDA Giveth, auDA Taketh Away

    ZDNet: auDA took away a domain from Sydney-based web-business after dispute, with only 24 hours notice, and it wasn't even that poor guy's fault! His business lost the domain name because 12 months ago NetRegistry mistakenly registered the dropped domain for them, although the original owner has renewed it. That just sounds dodgy.

    How can a regulator body provide any assurance to anyone who registered a domain? They can turn up any time, strip off the domain from you, and tell you that the domain you have registered 12 months ago actually belongs to someone else. As domain names are critical intellectual property these days, no assurance from even your regulator body can be a bit worrying.

    And how can a domain owner not noticing the lost of ownership until 12 months later?! Pingdom bombards me with emails if my websites were offline for more than 5 minutes! Unless of course you just bought the domain, park it somewhere else, together with your huge portfolio so one missing domain doesn't really ring the alarm until the "stocktake". According to WHOIS record of the current registrant, the ACN record cannot even be found at Business.gov.au. How MelbourneIT approves the registration is beyond me...

    On a related news, auDA has increased the fee for Dispute Resolution Policy due to amount of work required to resolve a dispute. Hmmm...

  2. Command Line WHOIS Safer? Not Quite

    This is a follow up to yesterday's post, where I looked at Network Solutions' domain tasting practise. It has long been warned on various Internet forums that you should not make WHOIS queries on registrars' web interface if you do not intend to buy straight away. Your queries might be logged by the dodgy registrar whose website you have been using, and these queries might be sold to domain tasters or cybersquatters, so that 2 days later when you actually want to register those domains, they become unavailable.

    The suggestion on "checking out a domain" has been:

    1. Try to query on trust worthy website, such as Jay's Domain Tools.
    2. Try to use a standalone WHOIS client, for example the "whois" command on your Linux console.

    The problem with (1) is -- how can you classify the website as trustworthy? Anyone can slap a disclaimer "we do not sell WHOIS queries" but how do you know whether your queries are logged, and how they process the logs internally? What happy if the website changes hands? For the ultra paranoid, no web-based WHOIS tools are trust worthy.

    Then, the "myth" is that command line WHOIS clients must be safe as you are querying the WHOIS server directly. The man-in-the-middle, i.e. the website acting as the front-end, is eliminated, thus there is no way your queries can be logged and resold. Well, the truth is, anything that can be queried can log those queries, and we are still ending up at ground 0 -- are you trusting the source?

    Who then, is the source that the command line WHOIS client is querying against?

    On my Debian, Ubuntu and Gentoo boxes, when you apt-get install whois or emerge whois, it uses the WHOIS software from here, "an improved whois client" and part of many Linux distributions. From the source code, it appears the default WHOIS source for .com and .net is -- Network Solutions! Under debian/changelog, it was changed from querying InterNIC to querying Network Solutions back in December 1999, i.e. 2x the eternity in Internet age.

    That also implies that every .com/.net WHOIS query you make using Debian's whois client, it is Network Solutions who receives the query and responds to it. It might be logged together with time and your IP address -- we simply don't know. I am not saying that NetSol is going to sell the queries on their WHOIS server to evil domainers. But then from NetSol's track record (registering prior to clients confirming purchase, wildcard deployment on .com (Verisign is the parent company of NetSol), etc etc) -- they will go low if there is financial gain from it. What they are going to do with the query log is probably anyone's guesses.

    On the other hand, GNU jwhois, which is the default WHOIS client on CentOS, still queries InterNIC for .com/.net domains, even at its latest 4.0 version. Now, who do you trust more? InterNIC who is operated by ICANN a "non-profit organisation", or Network Solutions who is a child company of VeriSign, a public company? Then again on InterNIC's whois page:

    Results for .com and .net are provided courtesy of Verisign Global Registry Services.

    I guess there is not much you can do about it. Still the old suggestion -- only query when you are ready to buy!

  3. Network Solutions is the Best

    Network Solutions is the best because they registered Scott-Yang-Rocks.com even before I asked them to! All I did was making a WHOIS query on their website to check the availability of this domain, and they have registered that domain without me going to the checkouts!

    How can I say bad things about a company that gives me such praises?! These guys are the best!

    (Okay, sorry about the sarcasm. For more information about Network Solutions doing dodgy domain tasting please read Jay Westerda's discovery on Domain Tools Blog, and my remark on the same topic at the Whirlpool forums last night. Here is the extract:

    The thing is, dodgy registrars do domain tasting by putting heaps of ads on the domain to "test the water". However it is not the case with Network Solutions -- all they put on the domain is a link for you to buy that domain at their inflated price. Someone from NetSol commented on DotSause saying they are not monetising the domain.

    www.dotsauce.com/2008/01...es/#comment-3565

    Quote:

    Network Solutions makes sure its search data is secure and we do not sell it any third party. I know that Network Solutions has no intention of keeping any searched domain or monetizing it.

    I think what they did is probably trying to block the competition, so that no one can perform a WHOIS on NetSol and then register the same domain at GoDaddy for less.

    The problem is, all the WHOIS queries might only be logged by the registrar and dodgy domainers have no way of knowing them (unless the registrars themselves are dodgy by selling the WHOIS queries). However all the domain changes are public knowledge from websites like DailyChanges.com.

    Now, all the dodgy domainers don't have to buy the WHOIS queries. All they need to do now is check the domains registered by NetSol as NelSol registers them as soon as WHOIS query is made. Since NetSol has no intention to keep and monetise those domains, the dodgy domainers can just snap them up when NetSol releases them.

    At the end, NetSol is NOT helping their customers by registering these domains, but they are unintentionally (or intentionally??) helping the domain tasters.

    Bad. Very bad.

    They now have changed the landing page showing "This Site Is Under Construction and Coming Soon" as of this morning, but the practise of registering as soon as WHOIS query is made still remains.

  4. $6.42 is the new price

    DomainTools: Wholesale price for .COM and .NET is going up, as $6.42 is the new wholesale price for these two TLD, recently issued by Verisign. We are expecting to see the price raises across all retailers and resellers later this year. Thanks to the monopoly! We are going to …
  5. EveryDNS Was Under DDoS Attack, Again

    HostingFu: EveryDNS Under DDoS Attack, which brought down many domains over the last 2 days. It actually hosts half of my active domains, including this very website and focuser.net. Slashdot also reported it today. Definitely not the first time. If you are on focuser.net and were wondering why …
  6. WordPress.com + Your Domain Only $10/year

    Matt of WordPress.com has announced domain registration and mapping for their blogging service -- $10/year if you already have a domain registered, or $15/year if you register through them. Very well priced service on a very scalable platform. I'll sign up if I don't already have more blog …
  7. I got spammed by GoDaddy!

    I run a small community blog site FOCUSer.net, who hosts WordPress blogs for members or ex-members of FOCUS. It also has an aggregator that tracks other FOCUS-related blogs, hosted on my box or elsewhere, and merge them into one single page in chronological order. I do not go around …
  8. Domain squatting my new addiction -- and I too need a stop!

    While searching for "dreamhost" on Google, I spotted Angela's new addiction -- buying domains for enthusiasms over potential future projects. I think for the last 2 months I have also been struck by the same disease. Maybe not domain squatting, but sometimes I just do a WHOIS search, and "hey, how …
  9. Domain Transferred to IntaServe

    After my article on Bargain Blog about the cheapest .au registrar, I decided to transfer my yang.id.au domain from NameScout, whom I registered with since July 2002, to IntaServe, because it is (a) $2/year cheaper (b) having an Australian contact number. However, the transfer didn't proceed that …
  10. Comment Spams with .info

    FOCUSer.net has been bambarded with lots of comment spams lately. As many members do not check their emails regularly for comment notifications, many spam messages were left there for a day or two. I have been tuning the Apache server configuration to block out spam bots, but many of …
  11. What?! EveryDNS Got Hacked Again

    EveryDNS, the free DNS provider that I have used for two of my domains, was under DDoS attack back in February this year. It took a few days to recover from the downtime, and many people who have hosted their domains on EveryDNS suffer as result. Unfortunately this seems to …
  12. EveryDNS Is Under DDoS Attack

    The saga continues from the story yesterday... Last night at around 10'ish, I thought EveryDNS has already been fixed because I can now see their website and use their web interface to modify my DNS configuration. I woke up this morning, and found some of my spooled emails still cannot …
  13. Free Domain Name Server Providers

    Introduction Most domain name registrars won't let you host your own DNS unless you have both master and slave (primary and secondary) DNS servers set up properly. However, not many people are priviledged to have that many boxes on the Internet, and sometimes it will be nice to have someone …