<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Scott Yang's Playground &#187; OpenOffice.org</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scott.yang.id.au/tag/openofficeorg/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scott.yang.id.au</link>
	<description>Faith, Technology and Randomness in Life, According to Scott</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 09 Feb 2012 09:01:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>How to Run Multiple/Concurrent OpenOffice.org Instances on Windows</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2009/11/how-to-run-multipleconcurrent-openoffice-org-instances-on-windows/</link>
		<comments>http://scott.yang.id.au/2009/11/how-to-run-multipleconcurrent-openoffice-org-instances-on-windows/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Nov 2009 06:13:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice.org]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Windows]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/2009/11/how-to-run-multipleconcurrent-openoffice-org-instances-on-windows/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In one of the project at work we have been using OpenOffice.org running in headless mode to do document format conversions in the background, i.e. converting to and from various MS Office formats OpenDocument formats and PDF. One problem of using standalone OpenOffice.org installation as backend is that you can only run one instance at [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In one of the project at work we have been using <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/">OpenOffice.org</a> running in headless mode to do document format conversions in the background, i.e. converting to and from various MS Office formats OpenDocument formats and PDF. One problem of using standalone OpenOffice.org installation as backend is that you can only run one instance at a time. So while you can have a multi-user front end doing various processing, we used to be able to run document format conversion one at a time.</p>
<p>That sucks.</p>
<p>Here&#8217;s a trick to run multiple OpenOffice.org instances concurrently, all from one single installation, on Windows. Assuming the latest OpenOffice.org 3.x is installed. It&#8217;s actually pretty simple &#8212; just change the <code>USERPROFILE</code> environment variable! Or <code>HOME</code> on Linux/Solaris.</p>
<p>For example, in Java</p>
<pre class="code">
ProcessBuilder pb = new ProcessBuilder("c:\\Program Files\\OpenOffice.org 3\\program\\soffice.exe",
    "-accept=socket,host=localhost,port=7999;urp;StarOffice.ServiceManager",
    "-invisible", "-headless", "-nologo", "-nofirststartwizard");
Map&lt;String, String&gt; env = pb.environment();
if (windoze) {
    env.put("USERPROFILE", "c:\\temp\\12345");
} else {
    env.put("HOME", "/tmp/12345");
}
Process ooo = pb.start();
</pre>
<p>Yeah I am putting this here because the search result on Google is pretty junky. And I just realised that I have not blogged for yonks. Busy buys busy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scott.yang.id.au/2009/11/how-to-run-multipleconcurrent-openoffice-org-instances-on-windows/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OpenOffice.org 3.0 &#8211; Download it Now!</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2008/10/openofficeorg-30-download-it-now/</link>
		<comments>http://scott.yang.id.au/2008/10/openofficeorg-30-download-it-now/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 09:56:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Technology]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Download]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/?p=1820</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Download Squad: OpenOffice.org 3.0 coming Monday, download it today. From the list of OO.o mirrors, AussieHQ and PacificNet already have 3.0 binaries there (dated 6 Oct). Time to download and upgrade! (and more work for me to support ODF 1.2 at work)&#8230;]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://scott.yang.id.au/file/images/openoffice-logo.jpg" width="200" height="71" alt="OpenOffice.org Logo" class="floaty"/> <a href="http://www.downloadsquad.com/2008/10/10/openoffice-org-3-0-coming-monday-download-it-today/">Download Squad: OpenOffice.org 3.0 coming Monday, download it today</a>. From the list of OO.o mirrors, <a href="http://openoffice.mirror.aussiehq.net.au/stable/3.0.0/">AussieHQ</a> and <a href="http://mirror.pacific.net.au/OpenOffice/stable/3.0.0/">PacificNet</a> already have 3.0 binaries there (dated 6 Oct). Time to download and upgrade! (and more work for me to support ODF 1.2 at work)&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scott.yang.id.au/2008/10/openofficeorg-30-download-it-now/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Jon Schwartz on Open Document Format</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2007/02/jon-schwartz-on-open-document-format/</link>
		<comments>http://scott.yang.id.au/2007/02/jon-schwartz-on-open-document-format/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 13 Feb 2007 13:06:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/2007/02/jon-schwartz-on-open-document-format/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jon Schwartz of Sun argues for Open Document Format on his blog + a ODF plugin for MS Office that has just been released by Sun as well. &#8220;Durability of information and file formats is exceptionally important to institutions or businesses with document retention policies that extend beyond the useful life of the software (and [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://scott.yang.id.au/file/images/opendocumentformat.png" width="64" height="64" alt="Open Document Format" class="floaty"/> <a href="http://blogs.sun.com/jonathan/entry/microsoft_vista_microsoft_office_and">Jon Schwartz of Sun argues for Open Document Format on his blog</a> + a ODF plugin for MS Office that has just been released by Sun as well. &#8220;<em>Durability of information and file formats is exceptionally important to institutions or businesses with document retention policies that extend beyond the useful life of the software (and employees) creating the documents &#8212; and ensures the availability of information well into the future.</em>&#8221; Lucky that my recently installed OpenOffice.org 2.1 can still read my files created in StarOffice 4, but ODF is indeed the step forward.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scott.yang.id.au/2007/02/jon-schwartz-on-open-document-format/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Mozilla Taking Over OpenOffice.org, No way!</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2006/10/mozilla-taking-over-openofficeorg-no-way/</link>
		<comments>http://scott.yang.id.au/2006/10/mozilla-taking-over-openofficeorg-no-way/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Oct 2006 13:44:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mozilla]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/2006/10/mozilla-taking-over-openofficeorg-no-way/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dana Blankenhorn of ZDNet suggested Mozilla should take over OpenOffice.org because of OO.o&#8217;s slow development. I think he is either out of his mind, or doing a &#8220;John Dvorak&#8221; style link bait (which I have bitten). For one, OpenOffice.org is leaps ahead of Office 97 &#8212; I&#8217;ll even argue that it is better than Office [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://blogs.zdnet.com/open-source/?p=822">Dana Blankenhorn of ZDNet suggested Mozilla should take over OpenOffice.org because of OO.o&#8217;s slow development</a>. I think he is either out of his mind, or doing a &#8220;John Dvorak&#8221; style link bait (which I have bitten). For one, OpenOffice.org is leaps ahead of Office 97 &#8212; I&#8217;ll even argue that it is better than Office 2003 in many ways. It is also a completely different beast than StarOffice 5.3 when Sun first open sourced it. Yes, it is a &#8220;beast&#8221; &#8212; 2.0.4 is 93Mb download on Windows comparing to Firefox 2&#8242;s 5.4Mb. And how would Mozilla Foundation help? Maybe I should just stop reading ZDNet blogs&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scott.yang.id.au/2006/10/mozilla-taking-over-openofficeorg-no-way/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NeoOffice 2 Aqua Beta Available to Subscribers</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2006/08/neooffice-2-aqua-beta-available-to-subscribers/</link>
		<comments>http://scott.yang.id.au/2006/08/neooffice-2-aqua-beta-available-to-subscribers/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Aug 2006 01:58:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/2006/08/neooffice-2-aqua-beta-available-to-subscribers/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NeoOffice, the OpenOffice.org for Mac OS X with a UI developed in Java, has released the Aqua beta to their supporters. NeoOffice 2.0 Aqua Beta is our first full Aqua release and uses native Aqua menus, file open and save dialogs, print dialogs, buttons, scrollbars, and many other native Aqua user interface elements. What is [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://scott.yang.id.au/file/images/neooffice-aqua-beta.jpg" alt="NeoOffice 2 Aqua Beta" width="250" height="188" class="floaty"/> <a href="http://trinity.neooffice.org/">NeoOffice</a>, the OpenOffice.org for Mac OS X with a UI developed in Java, has <a href="http://trinity.neooffice.org/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=114">released the Aqua beta to their supporters</a>.</p>
<blockquote><p>NeoOffice 2.0 Aqua Beta is our first full Aqua release and uses native Aqua menus, file open and save dialogs, print dialogs, buttons, scrollbars, and many other native Aqua user interface elements.</p></blockquote>
<p>What is different with this release is, the download will only be available to those who have purchased <a href="http://www.planamesa.com/neojava/earlyaccess.php">Early Access membership</a>, until 29<sup>th</sup> August where it will become available to general public. You can purchase the Early Access membership for USD$25 (or $10 after the 15<sup>th</sup>). Or you can pay USD$60 to have unlimited subscription to their future early access programs.</p>
<p>I think it is a great idea for open source software to fund their development this way. Those who support it will get something extra, i.e. earlier access to the latest development, but they are not locking everyone else out as the new version will still be available when the time comes. This is especially true with NeoOffice where they don&#8217;t get direct support from the OpenOffice.org guys, nor are they employed by Sun Microsystem to hack OOo.</p>
<p>NeoOffice 2 will require at least Mac OS X 10.3, or Mac OS X 10.4 if you are on a Mactel. I am in no hurry upgrading though &#8212; I am still running an old version of NeoOffice 1.1.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scott.yang.id.au/2006/08/neooffice-2-aqua-beta-available-to-subscribers/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Get Legal &#8212; Get OpenOffice.org</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2006/05/get-legal-get-openofficeorg/</link>
		<comments>http://scott.yang.id.au/2006/05/get-legal-get-openofficeorg/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 May 2006 00:12:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/2006/05/get-legal-get-openofficeorg/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OpenOffice.org is supporting Microsoft&#8217;s campaign of getting legitimate software, by proclaiming that you can get legal and free at the same time &#8212; by using OpenOffice.org! I can proudly say that I have not personally paid for a single copy of Microsoft Office in my entire lifetime &#8212; I have been using StarOffice 3 since [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img src="http://why.openoffice.org/images/ooo_get_legal.png" border="0" hspace="3" vspace="3" alt="Get legal. Get OpenOffice.org" class="floaty" width="128" height="58" /> <a href="http://why.openoffice.org/">OpenOffice.org is supporting Microsoft&#8217;s campaign of getting legitimate software</a>, by proclaiming that you can get legal and free at the same time &#8212; by using <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/">OpenOffice.org</a>! I can proudly say that I have not personally paid for a single copy of Microsoft Office in my entire lifetime &#8212; I have been using StarOffice 3 since my OS/2 Warp days (back in 95), ApplixWare on Linux (both I have paid for) and OpenOffice.org ever since it has been released. I still have a Microsoft T-shirt with &#8220;Be Legitimate&#8221; printing all over it (Vivian was a <del>storm trooper</del> compliance auditor for <del>galactic empire</del> Microsoft before). Maybe I should have &#8220;Get OpenOffice.org&#8221; printed at the back.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scott.yang.id.au/2006/05/get-legal-get-openofficeorg/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OpenOffice.org 2.0 has gone gold</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2005/10/openofficeorg-20-has-gone-gold/</link>
		<comments>http://scott.yang.id.au/2005/10/openofficeorg-20-has-gone-gold/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Oct 2005 00:41:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/2005/10/openofficeorg-20-has-gone-gold/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OpenOffice.org 2.0 has been released, for Windows, Linux and Solaris. Many bugs I have submitted are still pending (mostly OD&#60;-&#62;MS Office related), but still, well done guys! Download them at the nearest mirror.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.openoffice.org/press/2.0/press_release.html">OpenOffice.org 2.0 has been released</a>, for Windows, Linux and Solaris. Many bugs I have submitted are still pending (mostly OD&lt;-&gt;MS Office related), but still, well done guys! <a href="http://download.openoffice.org/2.0.0/">Download them</a> at the nearest mirror.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scott.yang.id.au/2005/10/openofficeorg-20-has-gone-gold/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Microsoft and OpenDocument</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2005/10/microsoft-and-opendocument/</link>
		<comments>http://scott.yang.id.au/2005/10/microsoft-and-opendocument/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 19 Oct 2005 04:52:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Microsoft]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Open Source]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/2005/10/microsoft-and-opendocument/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Microsoft might support OpenDocument if there is enough customer demand. OpenDocument is an OASIS standard, submitted to ISO, and is the standard file format for the up-coming OpenOffice.org 2. Way to go, Microsoft, and please show us how you will embrace the standard! However, if native PDF support in Office 12 can be regarded as [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.consortiuminfo.org/newsblog/blog.php?ID=1642">Microsoft might support OpenDocument if there is enough customer demand</a>. <a href="http://www.oasis-open.org/committees/tc_home.php?wg_abbrev=office">OpenDocument</a> is an OASIS standard, submitted to ISO, and is the standard file format for the up-coming <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/">OpenOffice.org 2</a>. Way to go, Microsoft, and please show us how you will embrace the standard! However, if <a href="http://blogs.msdn.com/brian_jones/archive/2005/10/01/476067.aspx">native PDF support in Office 12</a> can be regarded as &#8220;fulfilling customers&#8217; demand&#8221;, then it is going to be a long long wait for OpenDocument support, if it ever happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scott.yang.id.au/2005/10/microsoft-and-opendocument/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NeoOffice/J 1.1 Released</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2005/06/neoofficej-11-released/</link>
		<comments>http://scott.yang.id.au/2005/06/neoofficej-11-released/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Jun 2005 06:57:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/?p=1085</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[NeoOffice/J 1.1 has just been released. Based on OpenOffice.org 1.1.4 code base, NeoOffice/J runs on Mac OS 10.2, 10.3 and 10.4. Lots of improvement since the last major release, and it has been very stable for us. Use the torrent here to grab your own copy.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://neowiki.sixthcrusade.com/index.php/NeoOffice/J_1.1_Announcement#Announcement_.5Ben.5D">NeoOffice/J 1.1 has just been released</a>. Based on OpenOffice.org 1.1.4 code base, NeoOffice/J runs on Mac OS 10.2, 10.3 and 10.4. Lots of improvement since the last major release, and it has been very stable for us. Use the <a href="http://play.aelitis.com/torrents/NeoOfficeJ-1.1.dmg.torrent">torrent</a> here to grab your own copy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scott.yang.id.au/2005/06/neoofficej-11-released/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Previewing OpenOffice.org 2</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2004/12/previewing-openofficeorg-2/</link>
		<comments>http://scott.yang.id.au/2004/12/previewing-openofficeorg-2/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 15 Dec 2004 04:56:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/2004/12/previewing-openofficeorg-2/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Having used OpenOffice.org 1.9.62 for the last couple of days (while m65 has just been made public today), I gotta say that the up-coming OpenOffice.org 2 is really impressive. Functionality wise it has quite a lot of enhancement, and is already far exceeding my needs. Visual wise it looks great &#8211; no more &#8220;emulated&#8221; user [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having used OpenOffice.org <a href="http://development.openoffice.org/releases/1.9.m62_snapshot.html">1.9.62</a> for the last couple of days (while <a href="http://development.openoffice.org/releases/1.9.m65_snapshot.html">m65</a> has just been made public today), I gotta say that the up-coming OpenOffice.org 2 is really <em>impressive</em>. Functionality wise it has quite a lot of enhancement, and is already far exceeding my needs. Visual wise it looks great &#8211; no more &#8220;emulated&#8221; user interface that does not look right on any platform, but now OO.o 2 uses native platform widgets. It also has a new database engine that rivals Microsoft Access (well, not quite). Compatibility wise, it has no issue loading all my MS Office documents. All saved documents are conforming to the OpenDocument format, and now have file name extensions .od<em>[cdgw]</em>. The future of open source office suite is looking bright.</p>
<p>But then I accidentally clicked on the menu item &#8220;About OpenOffice.org&#8221;, and <strong>Horror</strong>!</p>
<p style="text-align:center"><img src="http://scott.yang.id.au/file/images/openoffice-1.9.62.jpg" alt="About OpenOffice.org 1.9.62" /></p>
<p>What a big hack :)</p>
<p>Just a comparison between Microsoft Word and the new OpenOffice.org Writer.</p>
<p style="text-align:center"><img src="http://scott.yang.id.au/file/images/ooo-2-vs-msword.jpg" alt="OpenOffice.org Writer vs. MS Word" /></p>
<p>Aren&#8217;t they look alike?!</p>
<p><b>Updated 21 Dec 2004</b>: <a href="http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=20293">The Inquirer ran the same story on previewing OpenOffice.org 2</a>, with quite a few screenshots. The one they looked at is m65.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scott.yang.id.au/2004/12/previewing-openofficeorg-2/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>3</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OpenOffice.org is 4</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2004/10/openofficeorg-is-4/</link>
		<comments>http://scott.yang.id.au/2004/10/openofficeorg-is-4/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 13 Oct 2004 20:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/2004/10/openofficeorg-is-4/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OpenOffice.org has turned 4, since Sun acquired StarOffice on 13 Oct 2000. Being a happy StarOffice user since version 3 on OS/2, it has completely fulfilled my productivity suite need. Happy birthday!]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.openoffice.org/about_us/birthday4.html">OpenOffice.org has turned 4, since Sun acquired StarOffice on 13 Oct 2000</a>. Being a happy StarOffice user since version 3 on OS/2, it has completely fulfilled my productivity suite need. Happy birthday!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scott.yang.id.au/2004/10/openofficeorg-is-4/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OpenOffice.org 1.1.2</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2004/06/openofficeorg-112/</link>
		<comments>http://scott.yang.id.au/2004/06/openofficeorg-112/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2004 00:22:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/2004/06/openofficeorg-112/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Apparently OpenOffice.org 1.1.2 has been released with the latest bug fixes. Quite a few fixes on MS Word docs crashing OO.o, according to release notes. Sounds like I&#8217;ll be downloading that tonight.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://download.openoffice.org/1.1.2/">Apparently OpenOffice.org 1.1.2 has been released with the latest bug fixes</a>. Quite a few fixes on MS Word docs crashing OO.o, according to <a href="http://download.openoffice.org/1.1.2/release_notes_1.1.2.html">release notes</a>. Sounds like I&#8217;ll be downloading that tonight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scott.yang.id.au/2004/06/openofficeorg-112/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Friday OpenOffice.org Links</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2004/02/friday-openofficeorg-links/</link>
		<comments>http://scott.yang.id.au/2004/02/friday-openofficeorg-links/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Feb 2004 06:49:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/2004/02/friday-openofficeorg-links/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[There is a review of OpenOffice.org 1.1.1b, the recently released beta for the new release of OpenOffice.org, i.e. the one I was eagerly waiting for as it (supposedly) fixed a table height bug that affects conversion between SXW and DOC. The review is pretty no frills &#8211; showing each of the OOo components without talking [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There is a <a href="http://www.flexbeta.net/main/articles.php?action=show&amp;id=35">review of OpenOffice.org 1.1.1b</a>, the recently released beta for the new release of <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/">OpenOffice.org</a>, i.e. the one I was eagerly waiting for as it (supposedly) fixed a table height bug that affects conversion between SXW and DOC. The review is pretty no frills &#8211; showing each of the OOo components without talking much about what is new with 1.1.1. It seems that <a href="http://development.openoffice.org/releases/OpenOffice_org_1_x.html 1.1.1">will be released on 7th of March</a>, according to their road map. My own download of 1.1.1b crashed a couple of times and tables still did not convert to DOC well when it is viewed in MS Word 2000 (but works okay under Word XP and 2003). Let&#8217;s see whether 1.1.1c released today will provide some improvement&#8230;</p>
<p>Meanwhile, OpenOffice.org1.1.1 fix 3 (whatever that is) <a href="http://trinity.neooffice.org/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=57">has been released</a> on Mac OS X from <a href="http://www.neooffice.org/">NeoOffice.org</a>. Too bad that it still requires X11 to run. At the same time, NeoOffice/J 0.8.1 <a href="http://trinity.neooffice.org/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=56">also got released</a> this week with <em>Finder icon support</em>, <em>improved 3D graphics</em>, <em>sound support</em> and many <em>bug fixes</em>. NeoOffice/J is based on the older OpenOffice.org 1.0 back-end, but it is much better integrated with Mac OS X. And, look Ma, <em>No X11</em>!! I am now torn between the two &#8211; Open or Neo?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scott.yang.id.au/2004/02/friday-openofficeorg-links/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>NeoOffice/J is The One</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2004/02/neoofficej-is-the-one/</link>
		<comments>http://scott.yang.id.au/2004/02/neoofficej-is-the-one/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Feb 2004 13:33:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/2004/02/neoofficej-is-the-one/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Three days ago I downloaded 120Mb of NeoOffice/J 0.8 by Patrick Luby, and has been playing around it for a while. Now I decided that OpenOffice.org 1.0.3 for Mac/X11 is no longer useful for me, as Neo does pretty much the same thing plus more &#8211; without the burden of running an X server. It [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Three days ago I downloaded 120Mb of <a href="http://www.planamesa.com/neojava/en/index.php">NeoOffice/J</a> <a href="http://trinity.neooffice.org/modules.php?name=News&amp;file=article&amp;sid=55">0.8</a> by <a href="http://www.planamesa.com/profile.html">Patrick Luby</a>, and has been playing around it for a while. Now I decided that <a href="http://www.openoffice.org/">OpenOffice.org</a> 1.0.3 for <a href="http://porting.openoffice.org/mac/">Mac/X11</a> is no longer useful for me, as Neo does pretty much the same thing plus more &#8211; without the burden of running an X server.</p>
<p>It starts up a bit faster than OOo103 on my iBook G3/900, and overall it feels more responsive. While it does not have an Aqua interface, it renders everything else beautifully &#8211; anti-alias everywhere just like other Mac OS X applications. It utilises Java 1.3 as the bridge between its OpenOffice.org internal and Mac&#8217;s front-end, so it uses all the native fonts. The new release also supports native input method, but I have not yet got it work due to font issues. After all, NeoOffice/J is based on OpenOffice.org1.0 architecture, which does not support Unicode properly. I might need to wait for OOo1.1 to be ported to move all my Chinese work onto my Mac.</p>
<p>Thumbs up for pluby. It is truly a great application, and there is even less reason to donate to Bill.</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
<p>This blog entry is written on <a href="http://www.kung-foo.tv/ecto/">ecto</a> <a href="http://www.kung-foo.tv/blog/archives/000758.php">1.0</a>, and it has become a shareware which costs USD$17.95 after 2 weeks of trail. ecto is a nice piece of blog tool which I have blogged <a href="http://scott.yang.id.au/archives/000425.php">here</a>. Should I pay AUD$25 for it, or go back to mt.cgi?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scott.yang.id.au/2004/02/neoofficej-is-the-one/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>1</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>OpenOffice.org X11 for Mac OS X Has Gone Gold</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2003/06/openofficeorg-x11-for-mac-os-x/</link>
		<comments>http://scott.yang.id.au/2003/06/openofficeorg-x11-for-mac-os-x/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2003 05:49:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[General]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Mac]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[OpenOffice.org]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/2003/06/openofficeorg-x11-for-mac-os-x-has-gong-gold/</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well. Just checked the OpenOffice.org web page, and it seems to happen during the weekend. OpenOffice.org goes Gold Master, from trinity.neooffice.org. What has been released is the OpenOffice.org X11 1.0.3, i.e. it requires an X11 server running as it is not a native Aqua application. It is a huge 169.57Mb download which comes with the [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well. Just checked the OpenOffice.org web page, and it seems to happen during the weekend. <a href="http://trinity.neooffice.org/modules.php?name=News&#038;file=article&#038;sid=15">OpenOffice.org goes Gold Master</a>, from <a href="http://trinity.neooffice.org/">trinity.neooffice.org</a>. What has been released is the OpenOffice.org X11 1.0.3, i.e. it requires an X11 server running as it is not a native Aqua application. It is a huge 169.57Mb download which comes with the native installer. I much prefer the smaller tarball format. OpenOffice.org 1.0.3 RC2 tarball is <em>only</em> 88.67Mb, and it comes with full set up script so it can do a network install. I need the network install as on my iBook, OpenOffice.org is shared with both my wife and I, under different user accounts. I have no idea about how to do a network install with the Mac OS X native installer&#8230;</p>
<p>Vivian and I have been using the 1.0.3 RC2 for a while, and it is very usable. It looks much better than the 1.0.1 beta, as you get the anti-alias fonts in the documents. However, comparing with a native Cocoa app, there is still no match. Another problem I am having now is with the international input under X, especially Chinese, as I need it a lot for preparing Bible studies. Too bad that I cannot use Mac OS X&#8217;s native input methods to type Chinese inside OOo for X11.</p>
<p>But still, congratulation to the OOo developers! I know they are heading down to WWDC for the week, and hopefully we will see a native Aqua version soon.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://scott.yang.id.au/2003/06/openofficeorg-x11-for-mac-os-x/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

