<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: ReviewMe and Text-Link-Ads &#8211; Time to Withdrawal?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scott.yang.id.au/2007/08/reviewme-and-text-link-ads-time-to-withdrawal/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2007/08/reviewme-and-text-link-ads-time-to-withdrawal/</link>
	<description>Faith, Technology and Randomness in Life, According to Scott</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:17:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: David</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2007/08/reviewme-and-text-link-ads-time-to-withdrawal/#comment-100492</link>
		<dc:creator>David</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 05 Aug 2010 02:00:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/2007/08/reviewme-and-text-link-ads-time-to-withdrawal/#comment-100492</guid>
		<description>Yep its not really that hard to detect when they are making a big song and dance about how they are obvious paid links and even now Text Link Ads still doesn&#039;t show in the search results, but a number of its affiliates do so they are still getting business from organic terms just not directly.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yep its not really that hard to detect when they are making a big song and dance about how they are obvious paid links and even now Text Link Ads still doesn&#8217;t show in the search results, but a number of its affiliates do so they are still getting business from organic terms just not directly.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: aie</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2007/08/reviewme-and-text-link-ads-time-to-withdrawal/#comment-99730</link>
		<dc:creator>aie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 15:25:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/2007/08/reviewme-and-text-link-ads-time-to-withdrawal/#comment-99730</guid>
		<description>i think reviewme is ok ;-) you should continue it, it pays more than google adsense based with my experience :P</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i think reviewme is ok ;-) you should continue it, it pays more than google adsense based with my experience :P</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ?????</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2007/08/reviewme-and-text-link-ads-time-to-withdrawal/#comment-90874</link>
		<dc:creator>?????</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 08 Feb 2008 08:00:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/2007/08/reviewme-and-text-link-ads-time-to-withdrawal/#comment-90874</guid>
		<description>I&#039;ve heard SEO isn&#039;t bad as long as your white hat.  If you have a good site people want to see, you&#039;re okay.  If you&#039;re a spammer site, thats what google is really going after.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve heard SEO isn&#8217;t bad as long as your white hat.  If you have a good site people want to see, you&#8217;re okay.  If you&#8217;re a spammer site, thats what google is really going after.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2007/08/reviewme-and-text-link-ads-time-to-withdrawal/#comment-87693</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2007 21:50:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/2007/08/reviewme-and-text-link-ads-time-to-withdrawal/#comment-87693</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m not an expert on the subject, so correct me if I&#039;m wrong, but I think SEO is bad.  What you&#039;re doing is making search engines think that your mediocre web site is better than good web sites with similar information.  That strikes me as deceitful.  If your site is good, other people will link to it more than they would bad web sites (in theory).  If the web is the information superhighway, the sites giving the best information should be the ones discovered first in search listings.

Of course, commercial web sites are a different story.  But even then it comes down to how good your merchandise is, and how well your site is made.  It might be hard to give search engines the idea that you sell the relevant things and take them seriously without annoying visitors, though.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m not an expert on the subject, so correct me if I&#8217;m wrong, but I think SEO is bad.  What you&#8217;re doing is making search engines think that your mediocre web site is better than good web sites with similar information.  That strikes me as deceitful.  If your site is good, other people will link to it more than they would bad web sites (in theory).  If the web is the information superhighway, the sites giving the best information should be the ones discovered first in search listings.</p>
<p>Of course, commercial web sites are a different story.  But even then it comes down to how good your merchandise is, and how well your site is made.  It might be hard to give search engines the idea that you sell the relevant things and take them seriously without annoying visitors, though.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scotty</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2007/08/reviewme-and-text-link-ads-time-to-withdrawal/#comment-87532</link>
		<dc:creator>scotty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Aug 2007 04:12:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/2007/08/reviewme-and-text-link-ads-time-to-withdrawal/#comment-87532</guid>
		<description>Let&#039;s see it this way. If you are Google, where you are competitive because you return relevant information in your search results. Now a whole class of occupations calling themselves Seach Engine Optimisation Experts came around and try to manipulate the result by buying links and reviews, so that what ranked first is no longer the most relevant, but the one paid most links...

What would you do if you are Google?

Personally I think SEO works. However due to conflict of interest there is always going to be a battle between the search engine and SEO. Personally I just cannot think myself out-smart Google...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Let&#8217;s see it this way. If you are Google, where you are competitive because you return relevant information in your search results. Now a whole class of occupations calling themselves Seach Engine Optimisation Experts came around and try to manipulate the result by buying links and reviews, so that what ranked first is no longer the most relevant, but the one paid most links&#8230;</p>
<p>What would you do if you are Google?</p>
<p>Personally I think SEO works. However due to conflict of interest there is always going to be a battle between the search engine and SEO. Personally I just cannot think myself out-smart Google&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dodgypress</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2007/08/reviewme-and-text-link-ads-time-to-withdrawal/#comment-87526</link>
		<dc:creator>Dodgypress</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 08 Aug 2007 16:47:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/2007/08/reviewme-and-text-link-ads-time-to-withdrawal/#comment-87526</guid>
		<description>Interesting scotty, I was/have been contemplating grabbing a paid review for link juice purposes, am still thinking about it. 

The experts over at Seo Refugee, seem to think, that its okay for that particular objective...????

Don</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting scotty, I was/have been contemplating grabbing a paid review for link juice purposes, am still thinking about it. </p>
<p>The experts over at Seo Refugee, seem to think, that its okay for that particular objective&#8230;????</p>
<p>Don</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

