ReviewMe and Text-Link-Ads – Time to Withdrawal?

I have been using both ReviewMe and Text-Link-Ads to monetise some of my websites and blogs. However two recent discoveries made me re-consider whether I should continue to go with them.

Text-Link-Ads is one of the biggest text-link broker. Site-wide text-links cost my advertisers around $25-$30 greenbacks a month here, and I get to keep half of it while TLA keeps the other half as commission. Not much, but a nice petty cash to cover all my hosting expenses. Thank you sponsors, although I cannot say I actually endorse the sites that bought links here.

The other day I googled their name and got a shocking response.

Googling Text-Link-Ads

They cannot even rank with their own name, and they have to buy AdWords campaigns to get into the search result. It cannot be the case where TLA is not well optimised for search engines (they rank #1 on Yahoo! and MSN Live), especially when the very nature of text-link-buying is search engine optimisation!

Well, only one explanation makes sense to me — Text-Link-Ads got sin-binned by the almighty G.

Let us not talk about Google’s motive. It MUST have everything to do providing search users the best experience and has NOTHING TO DO with forcing advertisers onto AdWords. But now they have killed the chicken to scare the monkey, and it does make other webmasters running much inferior sites wonder, should I buy links to game the system?

2. ReviewMe Articles Become Supplemental Results

ReviewMe, whom I reviewed and earned a few bucks, is a paid review broker. Too scared to anger the almighty G with paid links? How about links right inside the content so the PhDs in the Googleplex will never detect?

So I was trying to search for the ReviewMe reviews I have written for Oz Bargain Blog. Here is what Google gave me:

Google search result for my ReviewMe reviews

Do you see what I see? Every reviews I wrote, ALL FIVE OF THEM, are in supplemental result! The above screenshot was taken last month before the recent PageRank change, and all above articles are out of supplemental index by now. But the fact that Google has identified all ReviewMe sponsored articles I wrote, and the rest of my site is indexed well — that really scares me.

After all I have merely passed my engineering bachelor degree and I am clueless. The PhDs might have their ways to figure out the paid articles and penalise them accordingly.

So I quickly cancelled my ReviewMe account. No more paid review from me. So long, and thanks for all the fish. (Oh, the real reason could be that writing good reviews is just too time consuming and I am lazy, but just want to use Google ruining my monetisation plan as excuses…)

Category: General | Tue, 7 August 2007 3:44 pm

Comments

1.
Avatar for Dodgypress
Posted by Dodgypress on Thu, 9 August 2007 2:47 am

Interesting scotty, I was/have been contemplating grabbing a paid review for link juice purposes, am still thinking about it.

The experts over at Seo Refugee, seem to think, that its okay for that particular objective…????

Don


2.
Avatar for scotty
Posted by scotty on Fri, 10 August 2007 2:12 pm

Let’s see it this way. If you are Google, where you are competitive because you return relevant information in your search results. Now a whole class of occupations calling themselves Seach Engine Optimisation Experts came around and try to manipulate the result by buying links and reviews, so that what ranked first is no longer the most relevant, but the one paid most links…

What would you do if you are Google?

Personally I think SEO works. However due to conflict of interest there is always going to be a battle between the search engine and SEO. Personally I just cannot think myself out-smart Google…


3.
Avatar for Keith
Posted by Keith on Wed, 5 September 2007 7:50 am

I’m not an expert on the subject, so correct me if I’m wrong, but I think SEO is bad. What you’re doing is making search engines think that your mediocre web site is better than good web sites with similar information. That strikes me as deceitful. If your site is good, other people will link to it more than they would bad web sites (in theory). If the web is the information superhighway, the sites giving the best information should be the ones discovered first in search listings.

Of course, commercial web sites are a different story. But even then it comes down to how good your merchandise is, and how well your site is made. It might be hard to give search engines the idea that you sell the relevant things and take them seriously without annoying visitors, though.


4.
Avatar for ?????
Posted by ????? on Fri, 8 February 2008 6:00 pm

I’ve heard SEO isn’t bad as long as your white hat. If you have a good site people want to see, you’re okay. If you’re a spammer site, thats what google is really going after.


5.
Avatar for aie
Posted by aie on Wed, 30 December 2009 1:25 am

i think reviewme is ok ;-) you should continue it, it pays more than google adsense based with my experience :P


Add a comment

Gravatar is used. Email address is required but will not be displayed. Please keep your comment on topic. No spamming and/or bad language. First time poster will be moderated. Scott reserves the right to delete/edit your comments.