Oct 7 2005

AOL buys WIN for its AdSense revenue?

It has been a well known news, thanks to the power of blogosphere. PaidContent first leaked the acquisition of Weblogs Inc. by American Online, and then every second or third blogs I have been reading have reported on it.

LcF blogged about this sale, concluding:

Weblogs Inc. is a successful blogging network. Many of its blogs are top blogs of the Wold. The network earns USD$1 milllion from Google Adsense in a year. That’s still exclude the premium advertisements revenue. USD$20 millions is a good deal.

I have never seen USD$20mil in my life, but was it a “good deal” because Weblogs Inc. has potential to generate 1 million dollars a year “revenue” from AdSense? Let’s say, WIN gets 1.5 million dollars from Google, and another 1 million dollars from other advertisers and affliates. However what about its cost? Besides site hosting, domain name registration (which are negligible), other infrastructure cost, they still need to pay 100+ bloggers under their wings, quite a few staffs and Jason himself.

What’s left as “proft”?

Besides, being a subsidiary of AOL — would that damage their relationship with Google? Wouldn’t AOL resale the advertising themselves without profiting the “middle-man”?

I do not think it was the scenario in the AOL board room a few weeks ago:

Adviser 1: Weblogs Inc — They are just n00b in the media network.
Adviser 2: But Jason claimed he can make one million bucks from Google!
Adviser 1: OMG! w00t! Maybe we should buy them.
Adviser 2: Would 20mil be enough?
Jon M: they pwned.

I am sure AOL has its plans for its newly acquired blog network, but I don’t think “ability to generate 1 million dollars a year from AdSense” is the reason why it has been bought.

No Comments

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

*

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>