<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adsenselogger and Google&#8217;s TOS</title>
	<atom:link href="http://scott.yang.id.au/2005/09/adsenselogger-and-googles-tos/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2005/09/adsenselogger-and-googles-tos/</link>
	<description>Faith, Technology and Randomness in Life, According to Scott</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 13:17:24 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: clicks count</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2005/09/adsenselogger-and-googles-tos/#comment-88866</link>
		<dc:creator>clicks count</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Oct 2007 09:54:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/?p=10#comment-88866</guid>
		<description>I can&#039;t understand why I am getting one statistic from google - page impressions - that is 1/6th of my unique users stat from my host server.  Is google honest?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I can&#8217;t understand why I am getting one statistic from google &#8211; page impressions &#8211; that is 1/6th of my unique users stat from my host server.  Is google honest?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Scott Yang</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2005/09/adsenselogger-and-googles-tos/#comment-87831</link>
		<dc:creator>Scott Yang</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 13:01:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/?p=10#comment-87831</guid>
		<description>Jackie,

Indeed. I took a look at the source code, and was not pleased at the style of coding at all. I did spot a few places where SQL parameters were not escaped. Nasty.

I have also been writing my own ad tracking scripts. JS works with IE, Moz and Opera, and reporting interface will be based on Ajax (and Web 2.0).

Still coding...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jackie,</p>
<p>Indeed. I took a look at the source code, and was not pleased at the style of coding at all. I did spot a few places where SQL parameters were not escaped. Nasty.</p>
<p>I have also been writing my own ad tracking scripts. JS works with IE, Moz and Opera, and reporting interface will be based on Ajax (and Web 2.0).</p>
<p>Still coding&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jackie</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2005/09/adsenselogger-and-googles-tos/#comment-87829</link>
		<dc:creator>Jackie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Sep 2005 09:43:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/?p=10#comment-87829</guid>
		<description>I analyzed Adsenselogger and found 2 bad things: it sends an email when you install it, without saying (people doesn&#039;t read READMEs). The login page can be bypassed with sq injection. I think it is very insecure and classificable as spyware. IMHO use it at your risk, someone could steal your adsense account.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I analyzed Adsenselogger and found 2 bad things: it sends an email when you install it, without saying (people doesn&#8217;t read READMEs). The login page can be bypassed with sq injection. I think it is very insecure and classificable as spyware. IMHO use it at your risk, someone could steal your adsense account.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alistair</title>
		<link>http://scott.yang.id.au/2005/09/adsenselogger-and-googles-tos/#comment-87821</link>
		<dc:creator>Alistair</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Sep 2005 12:30:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://scott.yang.id.au/?p=10#comment-87821</guid>
		<description>As far as I&#039;m concerned, if they aren&#039;t going to provide you the required tools to report on your own traffic, then I can&#039;t see how or why you shouldn&#039;t be allowed to use your own.

End of the day, their ad tracking isn&#039;t effected and you are simply intercepting a click event so you can track it for yourself. If their software worked and reported enough information, people wouldn&#039;t be bothering to write their own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as I&#8217;m concerned, if they aren&#8217;t going to provide you the required tools to report on your own traffic, then I can&#8217;t see how or why you shouldn&#8217;t be allowed to use your own.</p>
<p>End of the day, their ad tracking isn&#8217;t effected and you are simply intercepting a click event so you can track it for yourself. If their software worked and reported enough information, people wouldn&#8217;t be bothering to write their own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

